Court Judgements




Chinhoyi High Court Judgements

IGNATIUS ZVIGADZA VERSUS ARCHBORD MUZANENHAMO (2023-11-06)
The applicant and the respondent were candidates in the Chinhoyi Municipality ward 4 elections held on the 23rd of August 2023. The respondent was declared the duly elected Councillor for the ward on the following day, the 24th. More

INNOCENT NYAMASOKA VERSUS DANIEL ZIVANAYI MUGUMBATE AND MUNICIPALITY OF KARIBA (2023-10-16)
What confronts this court in this civil trial is a box ring match. There is no witness testimony, nor is there any other real, direct and independent evidence to support either side’s averments. It is the plaintiff’s word against that of his opponent. The mammoth task is the need to place before the court enough circumstantial evidence upon which the court can plough through to arrive at a reasonable inference exclusively pointing one direction as opposed to the other, intriguingly bearing in mind the parameters of the burden of proof in Civil matters. More

JOSEPH NYAGWETA AND CHISTOPHER GARANDE VERSUS THE STATE (2024-04-22)
The 1st appellant is an Agronomist in the Hurungwe District of Mashonaland West. The 2nd appellant is farmer in Karoi. They were jointly charged with fraud in contravention of s136 of the Criminal Law [codification and Reform] Act (Chapter 9:23). The offence relates to fraud in respect of agricultural inputs supplied by the Government. More

JOSEPHINE RUNGANGA VERSUS PRESSMORE NYAMANGARA (2024-01-02)
This is an appeal against the decision of a Magistrate Court sitting as a Community Court of appeal ordering her eviction. More

KADOMA AGRICULTURAL SHOW SOCEITY AND CRISPEN DIRAO AND TALENT GARIKAI AND LUCKSON MUNYAI AND HARDDAY MANDAVA AND AKIM MHENE AND THERESA CHINGALE AND LEOCADIA DUBE AND GIFT NDHLOVU VERSUS EDDLIGHT DEKWE AND SHEPHERD KATSATSU AND JAMES SAKALA AND TINASHE DZINOREVA AND CHRISTOPHER CHENENHAMO AND THERESA ZINTO AND PATSON MADERA (2022-06-30)
This is an urgent chamber application to interdict the respondents from carrying out executive functions of the first applicant including preparations for the August 2022Kadoma agricultural show. The first applicant is a legal persona with capacity to sue and be sued. The second to the ninth applicants purport to be the lawful appointed authority to administer the affairs of the first applicant. The respondents are individuals with capacity to be sued. They too claim to be the lawful committee to run the first applicant’s affairs. At the heart of this dispute, is the control of the first applicant. More


Midlands State University Library