Court Judgements




Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe Judgements

MAYOR LOGISTICS (PVT) LTD V ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY (2014-07-22)
This Urgent Chamber Application was placed before me because the Chief Justice was not available to hear it. The application raised two questions for determination. The first question is whether an interim order suspending the operation of legislation compelling payment by a taxpayer of the amount of tax liable to be paid notwithstanding an appeal to the Fiscal Appeal Court or pending a decision of a court should be granted pending the hearing and determination of the main application challenging the constitutional validity of the legislation by the full bench of the Constitutional Court. The second question is whether an... More

MISHECK MUZA V (1) REGGY FRANCIS SARUCHERA (IN HIS CAPACITY AS LIQUIDATOR OF J.W. JAGGERS WHOLESALERS (PVT) LTD) (2) PRICE TRUST (3) MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT (4) REGISTRAR OF DEEDS (2019-02-27)
The applicant approached the Constitutional Court (“the Court”) in terms of r 32(2) of the Constitutional Court Rules, 2016 (“the Rules”) seeking leave to appeal against an order of the Supreme Court (“the court a quo”) which was couched as follows: “WHEREUPON, after reading documents filed of record, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The appeal having been withdrawn, the appeal be and is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.” (emphasis added) More

MOHAMMED ISMAIL [IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE GUARDIAN OF YUSUF ISMAIL (A MINOR)] V (1) ST. JOHN’S COLLEGE (2) CAVALIERE CORRADO TRINCI N.O (3) STEVE MARTIN N.O (4) MINISTER OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION (2019-10-14)
This is a chamber application for an order for leave to appeal to the Constitutional Court (“the Court”), against a decision of the Supreme Court (“the court a quo”) in terms of r 32(2) of the Constitutional Court Rules, S.I. 61/2016 (“the Rules”). The rule provides that a litigant who is aggrieved by the decision of a subordinate court on a constitutional matter only may apply to the Court for leave to appeal against such decision. More

MORGAN TSVANGIRAI V (1) ROBERT GABRIEL MUGABE (2) ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL COMMISSION (3) RITA MAKARAU, N.O. (4) CHIEF ELECTIONS OFFICER (2013-08-20)
Seven days after the declaration on 3 August 2013 of the results of the Presidential election (hereinafter referred to as “the election”) held on 31 July 2013, showing Robert Gabriel Mugabe (hereinafter referred to as “the first respondent”) as the winner of the election, Morgan Tsvangirai (hereinafter referred to as “the petitioner”), who was one of the candidates contesting the election, lodged with the Constitutional Court (hereinafter referred to as “the Court”) a petition challenging the validity of the election under s 93(1) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “the Constitution”). More

MOVEN KUFA AND VOICE FOR DEMOCRACY TRUST V (1) THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE (2) THE PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE (3) SAVIOUR KASUKUWERE (4) JOSEPH MADE (5) WALTER MZEMBI (6) FLORA BUKA (7) SYLVESTER NGUNI (8) HENRY MADZORERA (9) GILES MUTSEKWA (10) SEKAI HOLLAND (2017-11-22)
This is an appeal against the decision of the High Court dismissing with costs an application made by the appellants seeking an order declaring the appointment of certain ministers of government to be unconstitutional and, in the alternative, an order directing the first and second respondents to act in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution. More


Midlands State University Library