Court Judgements




Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe Judgements

OWEN MASEKO V THE STATE PISHAI MUCHAURAYA V THE STATE (2014-01-15)
Both matters were disposed of on the basis of a concession made that the facts in respect of each case did not disclose an offence. What follows are the reasons for the order made on that day striking both matters off the roll. More

PATRICIA DENGEZI V (1) MUNYARADZI NYAMURURU (2) XOLISAN MOYO (3) CHAMPIONS INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (4) THE COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE (5) MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS (2023-11-20)
The applicant was in the informal business of vending. On 17 April 2017, while selling her wares from a pavement on Chinhoyi Street close to Robert Mugabe Avenue in Harare, she was involved in a tragic accident. In her company was her son who was aged one year and two months. More

PAUL MADZORE V THE STATE (2014-05-28)
This is a matter that was referred to this court by a magistrate in terms of s 24(2) of the former Constitution of Zimbabwe, (“the former Constitution”). The applicant was arraigned before a magistrate at Harare on a charge of assaulting or resisting a peace officer as defined in s 176 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, [Chapter 9:23]. The allegation was that on 14 December 2006, at Makomva Shopping Centre, Glen View 2, Harare, the applicant assaulted one Everisto Maponga, a Police Officer, who was performing his duty, by pushing him away with both hands. More

PERFECT NYATHI V THE STATE (2019-07-17)
This is a referral in terms of s 175(4) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013 (“the Constitution”) from the Magistrate’s Court (“the court a quo”) sitting at Gwanda. More

PITTY MPOFU (2) SAMUKELISIWE MLILO V THE STATE (2016-06-15)
This matter is brought by way of referral in terms of s 24 (2) of the former Constitution of Zimbabwe (“the former Constitution) which provides as follows: “24 Enforcement of protective provisions (1)… (2) If in any proceedings in the High Court or in any court subordinate to the High Court any question arises as to the contravention of the Declaration of Rights, the person presiding in that court may, and if so requested by any party to the proceedings shall, refer the question to the Supreme Court unless, in his opinion, the raising of the question is merely frivolous... More


Midlands State University Library