Court Judgements




Masvingo High Court Judgements

CHARLES JACKSON VERSUS THE STATE (2020-03-13)
The dispute in this matter is whether the now deceased died from violence arising from domestic violence or that she took her own life for reasons not very clear as a result of domestic dispute. More

CHARLES MASANGO AND GLORIA MASAWI VERSUS MINISTER OF PRIMARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION N.O. AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND THE DISTRICT SCHOOLS INSPECTOR, MBERENGWA N.O. AND THE HEADMASTER, CHINGOMA HIGH SCHOOL, MBERENGWA (2017-02-17)
This was an urgent chamber application for an interdict. I heard it on 14 February 2017 and reserved judgment. Evidently the application was prepared without regard to the elementary requirements for an interlocutory interdict. Even the argument on urgency was tenuous. More

CHIDO MUROMBEDZI VERSUS SMM HOLDINGS [PVT] LTD (2018-06-13)
This was an appeal against an order of eviction granted by the court a quo in favour of the respondent against the appellant. The order of eviction was in relation to certain premises, a dwelling house, situate Shabani Mine, Zvishavane, owned by the respondent but which had at all relevant times been allocated to, and was occupied by, the appellant by virtue of his employment with the respondent. More

CHIEF INSPECTOR CHUMA 040776 W VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE AND THE PRESIDING MAGISTRATE N.O. AND THE TRIAL PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE WAMAMBO J MASVINGO, 4 & 10 OCTOBER 2019 AND 29 JANUARY, 2021 (2021-01-29)
Applicant is applying for a permanent stay of prosecution. He is a police officer who had charges preferred against him in 2015 in terms of the Police Act. A board of inquiry to try applicant was convened for applicant to be tried for contravening paragraph 39 of the Schedule to the Police Act [Chapter 11:10] “improperly using his position as member for his private advantage". More

CHIGAMI 2 SYNDICATE & 2 OTHERS VERSUS CLEO BRAND INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD (2020-03-20)
The parties to this dispute can loosely be described as “business partners” in a joint mining venture. In a contract whose interpretation now forms the subject matter of the dispute, the applicant appears and have agreed to permit the respondent to "work" on three of its mining claims in return for certain sums of money as consideration. I deliberately used the word“appear” for the simple reason that the parties are now bitterly divided over the meaning and import of the terms of the contract and ultimately its validity. More


Midlands State University Library