Court Judgements




Masvingo High Court Judgements

TRIANGLE LIMITED AND HIPPO VALLEY ESTATES LIMITED VS ZIMBABWE SUGAR MILLING INDUSTRY WORKERS UNION (ZSMIWU) GODFREY KATERERE BRAWL CHIKANDIWA TAVONGA VANDIRAI LUCIA CHIRILELE NOKHUTULA DUBE FASTER SOPPER GONO BERRINGTON ZVANYANYA SAMUEL JINJIKA P. CHIKAMI Z. MANARA A. SIBANDA J. GWANYANYA ADMORE HWARARE ZIMBABWE FEDERATION OF TRADE UNIONS MINISTER OF PUBLIC SERVICE, LABOUR & SOCIAL WELFARE (2019-10-16)
The applicants filed an Urgent Chamber Application on 26th September, 2019. The first to seventh respondents filed opposing papers on the date of the hearing The 8th to 14th respondents did not file any papers and their position is that they do not oppose the application, if the terms thereof are broadened to encapsulate their interests. Mr K. Shamuyariraa trade unionist representing the 15th respondent is opposed to the application. He also did not file opposing papers. More

TRIANGLE LIMITED AND HIPPO VALLEY ESTATES VERSUS ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY AND ZIMBABWE SUGAR CANE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION AND ZIMBABWE CANE FARMERS ASSOCIATION AND MKWASINE SUGARCANE FARMERS TRUST AND COMMERCIAL SUGARCANE FARMERS ASSOCIATION OF ZIMBABWE AND HIPPOVALLEY PRODUCTIVE FARMERS ASSOCIATION AND ZIMBABWE SUGARCANE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ROYAL TRUST AND CHIPIWA MPAPA MILL GROUP AND CHIREDZI PRODUCTIVE CANE GROWERS ASSOCIATION AND FARAI DUMO AUGUSTINE MUSIKAVANHU AND ROY BHILA (2020-06-24)
The parties in this application are embroiled in a bitter dispute over the implications of their failure to specifically include Value added tax (abbreviated herein as “VAT”) matters in agreements for the milling of sugarcane. More

VENGAI RUSHWAYA VERSUS NELSON BVUNGO AND THE SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE N.O (2017-03-27)
This was an urgent chamber application for a stay of execution pending the determination of an application for rescission of judgment. The first respondent took a point in limine that the matter was not urgent. I reserved judgment on that and directed argument on the merits. Towards the end of submissions it seemed the matter could be amicably resolved by treading the middle path. By consent I could order a stay provided the applicant paid security in terms of Order 32 r 246[3]. More

VENGAI RUSHWAYA VERSUS NELSON BVUNGO AND THE SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE N.O. (2017-03-27)
This was an urgent chamber application for a stay of execution pending the determination of an application for rescission of judgment. The first respondent took a point in limine that the matter was not urgent. I reserved judgment on that and directed argument on the merits. Towards the end of submissions it seemed the matter could be amicably resolved by treading the middle path. By consent I could order a stay provided the applicant paid security in terms of Order 32 r 246[3]. It reads: More

WAYNE DOMINIC MATHETHA VERSUS THE STATE (2019-02-20)
This is an appeal against both conviction and sentence. After hearing both counsel on 31 October 2018 we directed that both counsel file supplementary heads of argument on some point of law as both counsel conceded that they were not prepared to make meaningful submissions on that point we had raised. The supplementary heads of argument were to be filed by 16 November, 2018. More


Midlands State University Library