Court Judgements




Bulawayo High Court Judgements

UBUTH BETHU MINING (PVT) LTD T/A UBUNTU BETHU MINING (PVT) LTD VERSUS A B J ENGINEERING (PVT) LTD (2021-09-30)
MABHIKWA J: In this matter, plaintiff issued summons on 15 September 2017 where it claimed: (a) The refund of the US$21 700 being the balance of the purchase price for a stamp mill which the parties agreed that defendant would refund to the plaintiff following the parties’ agreement to cancel the contract of sale. Plaintiff had allegedly bought a stamp mill from the defendant. (b) Costs of suit. In its plea, defendant admitted that the parties entered into an agreement of sale, save to say that such agreement was oral. Defendant also admitted that plaintiff paid $26 700 towards the... More

USHER MOYO VERSUS THE STATE (2023-10-12)
This is a bail application pending trial. The applicant is charged with the crime of robbery as defined in s 126 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (Criminal Code). It being alleged that on 18 August 2023 at 2200 hours the applicant in the company of accomplices who still at large, armed with one unidentified firearm, knobkerries, axes, a hammer and a machete attacked the complainant, disarmed him of his revolver gun loaded with three rounds. And forcibly took his identity card, NSSA card, CBZ bank debit card, Itel cellphone, and loaded stolen gold ore into... More

VENGAI DARLINGTON JASI AND ARCHIFOLD ZHANJE VERSUS THE STATE (2022-06-02)
1. This is a composite judgment in respect of two applications for bail pending appeal, i.e. Cases No. HC 186/22 and HC 187/22. The applicants in both cases were jointly charged and tried together before the Regional Magistrate Court, sitting in Plumtree. Although each applicant filed his own notice of appeal, they are appealing the same judgment, and they both seek release on bail pending the finalisation of their respective appeals against the same judgment. At the hearing of the applications, applicants were both represented by one counsel. I then heard the two applications jointly and hence this composite judgment. More

VENGAYI NYENYA VERSUS THE STATE (2023-01-12)
Applicant was arraigned before the Magistrates Court sitting at Beitbridge on a charge of fraud as defined in section 136 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act (Chap 9:23). Applicant pleaded not guilty to the charge and was duly convicted at the end of a full trial. Applicant was sentenced to 60 months imprisonment with 36 months suspended on the usual condition of future good conduct. A further 4 months were suspended on condition of restitution. Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence, applicant lodged an appeal with this court. This is an application for bail pending appeal. The application... More

VICTORIA FALLS MUNICIPALITY VERSUS LOT SYATIMBULA (2020-03-19)
The applicant is a local authority established in terms of the Urban Councils Act (Chapter 24:03). The applicant is the registered owner of stand 484 Jakaranda Drive, Victoria Falls. The stand is currently being occupied by the respondent. More


Midlands State University Library