Court Judgements
This is an appeal against an arbitral award where the arbitrator ruled in favour of the now Respondents in a case where the parties were locked in a dispute of over certain allowances and the reduction of the now Respondents’ employment contract to wiring. More
The applicant, Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission, is a statutory body. It owes its existence to the Constitution of Zimbabwe. Its aim and object are to fight and, as its name suggests, eradicate corruption from within the lengths and breadths of the country. It deals with such other offences as theft, misappropriation of funds, abuse of power and other improper conduct in both the public and private sectors of Zimbabwe. It investigates and exposes cases of corruption and all crimes which are related to it. More
The applicant is a universitas, being a church of Christian denomination. It is established in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. On 8 July 2021, the applicant filed an urgent chamber application seeking relief primarily against the first and second respondents. The relief sought is set out in the draft provisional order accompanying the application and it reads as follows: More
The 1st applicant in this matter is the Zimbabwe Banking and Allied Workers Union (ZIBAWU). The union was originally registered in February 1991 to cover banking institutions and in April 1992 its scope of coverage was varied to cover financial institutions. More
This is a provisional sentence matter. On 9 November 2004, the plaintiff issued provisional sentence summons against
the defendant, claiming provisional sentence in an amount of $720 428 163.97 (Seven
Hundred and Twenty Million Four Hundred and Twenty- Eight Thousand One Hundred
and Sixty Three Dollars and Ninety Seven Cents), together with interest thereon at the
prescribed rate from 5 April 2004, being the date of demand to date of payment in full. More
The appeal was noted against an arbitral award handed down by the Hon. G. Kwaramba dated 28th October 2014.
The Respondent was employed by the appellant as a Consultant effective 1st March 2009. The consultancy agreement terminated on the 24th of July 2013. The respondent thereafter lodged a claim for unlawful dismissal and non-payment of terminal benefits and salaries. The matter was referred to arbitration in terms of Section 98(6) of the Labour Act [Cap 28:01]. The terms of reference before the Arbitrator were as follows;
1. To determine whether or not there was unlawful dismissal and non-payment of terminal... More
This judgment concerns two applications for condonation filed by the Applicant. They are for condonation for late filing of heads of argument in both an application for interim relief and the main appeal. More
