Court Judgements
The plaintiff, Zimbabwe United Passenger Company, better known as ZUPCO issued summons in 2006 for the eviction of the defendants or any persons occupying the premises through them, to vacate premises known as No. 9 Hood Rd, Southerton, Harare. ZUPCO also sued for costs jointly and severally on a higher scale. More
ZIMBABWE URBAN COUNCIL APPLICANT WORKERS UNION AND MUNICIPALITY OF MARONDERA RESPONDENT (2014-10-10)
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against a decision of this Court handed down on 28 February 2014. More
This is an appeal for the registration of an arbitral award. The applicant is a union. The founding affidavit was sworn to by a Mr Mathias Mandaza and it refers to the award that was made in favour of the union on 16 December 2015, wherein the respondent was ordered to pay a sum ofUS$1 116 503,50. The applicant avers that the award remains unsatisfied as respondent has failed, neglected and or refused to comply with the arbitral award.
The respondent has raised a point in limine to the effect that applicant is a legal persona with a constitution which... More
This is an application for leave to execute pending appeal against the judgment of this court per MAKONESE J under case number HC 2434/17 registering an arbitral award in favour of the applicant.
The facts are that the applicant’s members are respondent’s employees. Pursuant to a dispute over non-payment of applicant’s members’ salaries, an Arbitrator granted an award on 16 December 2015 ordering respondent to pay US$1 116 053,,50 to the applicant. On 12 September 2017 the applicant filed an application for the registration of the award under HC 2434/17 in terms of s98(14) of the Labour Act (Chapter 28:01).... More
ZIMBABWE URBAN COUNCIL WORKERS UNION APPELLANT AND MUNICIPALITY OF MARONDERA RESPONDENT (2014-02-28)
The Zimbabwe Urban Council Workers Union (ZUCWU) is representing 89 Marondera Municipality employees who were contract employees. The employees have been reviewing their contracts of employment every month from date of engagement for periods ranging from six months to at least eighteen years. More
On 11th January 2013 Applicant filed an application for rescission of judgment. On 5th February 2013 Respondent filed a response in which she opposed the application. In due course the matter was set down for hearing. More
The applicant brought a claim in terms of the Trademarks Act [Chapter 26:04], the Act , to interdict and restrain therespondent from infringing rights flowing from its trademark,passing off its services and an order for removal of infringing marks and related getups or any confusingly or deceptive similar trademarks from all matter in its possession or control. More
