Court Judgements




(1) THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE (2) PARLIAMENT OF ZIMBABWE (3) THE SPEAKER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY V (1) INNOCENT GONESE (2) JESSIE MAJOME (3) THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE, LEGAL & PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (4) THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE (2021-02-25)
On 31 March 2020, this Court handed down judgment number CCZ 4/2020, disposing of two applications made by the first and second respondents against the applicants and the third and fourth respondents under cases number CCZ 57/2017 and 58/2017 respectively. The two applications, filed separately and on different dates, were brought in terms of s 167 (2)(d) of the Constitution as read with r 27 of the Constitutional Court Rules 2016, alleging that the second applicant had failed to fulfil the obligation to pass Constitutional Bill (No 1) of 2017 in accordance with the Constitution. More

(1) THE TRUSTEES FOR THE TIME BEING OF CORNERSTONE TRUST (2) JULIUS TAWONA MAKONI (3) THE TRUSTEES FOR THE TIME BEING OF RYVONNE TRUST V NMB BANK LIMITED (2021-09-24)
HLATSHWAYO JA: This is an appeal against the entire judgment delivered by the Honourable Justice Zhou in the High Court of Zimbabwe. The order sought to be impugned reads as follows: “IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Judgment be and is hereby given in favour of the plaintiff against the first, second and third defendants jointly and severally the one paying the others to be absolved for: (a) Payment of US$1 105 748.90 plus interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the 9 September 2015 such interest calculated monthly and in advance on the said sum and... More

(1) TRIANGLE LIMITED (2) HIPPO VALLEY ESTATES LIMITED V (1) ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY (2) ZIMBABWE SUGARCANE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (3) ZIMBABWE CANE FARMERS ASSOCIATION (4) MKWASINE SUGARCANE FARMERS TRUST (5) COMMERCIAL SUGARCANE FARMERS ASSOCIATION OF ZIMBABWE (6) HIPPO VALLEY PRODUCTIVE FARMERS ASSOCIATION (7) ZIMBABWE SUGARCANE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ROYAL TRUST (8) CHIPIWA MPAPA MILL GROUP (9) CHIREDZI PRODUCTIVE CANE GROWERS (10) FARAI DUMO AUGUSTINE MUSIKAVANHU (11) ROY BHILA (2021-07-01)
This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court sitting at Masvingo delivered on 24 June 2020 which dismissed with costs the application made by the two appellants for a declaratory order and an interdict. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The two appellants are sugar producing giants in the Lowveld while the first respondent is the statutory body charged with revenue collection in Zimbabwe. The remainder of the respondents are either sugar cane farmers or associations representing such farmers. The respondents will be referred to in this judgment for convenience, as Zimbabwe Revenue Authority and the farmers respectively More

(1) ZIMBABWE LAW OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (2) DERECK CHARAMBA V (1) NATIONAL PROSECUTING AUTHORITY (2) THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL N.O. (3) MINISTER OF JUSTICE, LEGAL AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS N.O. (4) COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE (5) ATTORNEY GENERAL (2019-02-19)
This is an application brought in terms of s 85(1) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (hereinafter called ‘the Constitution’). The applicants seek an order declaring the employment of serving members of the security services, as prosecutors, to be unconstitutional. More

(1) ZIMBABWE LAW OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (2) DERECK CHARAMBA V (1) NATIONAL PROSECUTING AUTHORITY (2) THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL N.O. (3) MINISTER OF JUSTICE, LEGAL AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS N.O. (4) COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE (5) ATTORNEY GENERAL (2019-02-19)
This is an application brought in terms of s 85(1) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (hereinafter called ‘the Constitution’). The applicants seek an order declaring the employment of serving members of the security services, as prosecutors, to be unconstitutional. More

(1) EDMORE TAPERESU MAZAMBANI V (1) INTERNATIONAL EXPORT TRADING COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED (2) C. CHITIYO (2020-06-29)
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court handed down on 4 September 2018, dismissing with costs, an application made by the appellant in terms of Article 34 of the Arbitration Act (Chapter 7:15) for the setting aside of an arbitral award issued in favour of the first respondent by the second respondent. More

(1) FISANI MOYO (2) VALENTINE MINE V (1) BLANKET MINE (1983) PRIVATE LIMITED (2) ZIMBABWE REPUBLIC POLICE GWANDA (3) PROVINCIAL MINING DIRECTOR N.O (2022-07-23)
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court of Zimbabwe handed down on the 31 August 2021, and ordering the eviction of the appellants and all those claiming occupation through them, from a mining claim labelled Valentine 56. At the end of the hearing, the court dismissed the appeal with costs and indicated that full reasons for the judgment would follow in due course. These are they. More


Midlands State University Library