Court Judgements
This is an appeal against the wholejudgment of the Labour Court handed down on 1 August 2019, dismissing an application for the confirmation of a draftrulingof a labour officer (second respondent), to the effect that transfer of the employees (appellants) from Kwekwe Brewery to the first respondent constituted a transfer of an undertaking in terms of s 16 (1) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28.01]. More
Applicant has approached this court on a certificate of urgency seeking the following relief:
“Interim relief sought
That pending confirmation of this order on the return day, the following relief is granted:
1. The provisional order granted in case number HC 167/19 on 19 March 2019 is hereby discharged. More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High court handed down on 15 June 2016, granting a declaratory order in favour of the respondent. The judgment declared binding and enforceable certain agreements concluded between the respondent and Interfin Bank Limited and further compelled the first and second appellants to honour the terms of the agreements. More
This is a referral by the High Court for determination under s 24(2) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe of questions of alleged violations of the fundamental rights of the applicants guaranteed under ss 13(1) (right to personal liberty); 15(1) (right not to be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment) and 18(1) (right to the protection of the law). More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court, dismissing the appellants’ application for an order setting aside the decision of the Master of the High Court in terms of s 52 (9) (i) of the Administration of Estates Act [Chapter 6:01]. More
On 2 September 2016, the High Court (MTSHIYA J) granted a provisional order in favour of the respondents in the following terms:-
“IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents and any person acting through them be and are hereby interdicted from infringing on the applicant’s Trademarks No. 1710/200 in Class 34 by using the name RG or any packaging likely to deceive or cause confusion on or in relation to any of the goods for which the marks are registered.
2. The 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents and any person acting through them be and are... More
The first appellant is the Minister of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs,while the second appellant is the Attorney General.The respondent,Nyasha Chiramba ,is a law student who introduces himself as a firm believer in human rights.
Therespondentfiledaconstitutionalapplicationinthecourtaquoforamandamuscompellingtheappellantstocomplywiths106(3)oftheConstitutionofZimbabwe2013 [ “the Constitution”], by initiating the process of enacting the Act contemplated in the subsection. The respondent asserted locus standi to bring the application on the basis that he has an interest in enforcing compliance with the supreme law of the land. More
