Court Judgements
Browse Judgements by Year
The applicant issued summons claiming against the defendant the sum of $12 087-49 being money owed arising from a loan advanced to the first defendant which the first defendant has failed to pay despite demand. The applicant also claims interest at the rate of 45% and costs of suit on the legal practitioner and client scale. The second defendant agreed to be bound as surety and co-principal debtor in respect of the first defendant’s indebtedness. More
On 19 June 2002, the applicants and the respondent entered written into a retrenchment package agreement (agreement). More
This is an appeal against the judgment of the Labour Court handed down on 14 February 2014 in which the respondent was reinstated to his former position without loss of salary or benefits. More
This is a chamber application for a prohibitory interdict brought on a certificate of urgency. The applicant is a duly constituted Association whose existence and governance is in terms of its constitution. It is a voluntary association of some players in the sugar industry. More
Zimbabwe Cover Legal Aid Trust, a body corporate duly registered as such in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe issued summons against the defendant (excipient) one Claudious Taunzwasure Chirochangu claiming a payment of the sum of US$ 41 580.00, payment of interest on the capital sum at the rate of 20% per month calculated from the 24th November 2014 to date of full payment. In the alternative, and in the event of the defendant failing to pay the capital sum and interest within time to be fixed by this Honourable Court, an order declaring the sale of the property being... More
On 11 October 2012 the first respondent obtained a court order in HC 5475/09 against the applicant to the following effect.
“It is ordered that:
1. The award in the arbitration matter of Mr. Muzamhindo and Zimbabwe Cricket Union held before the Honourable J.T. Mawire dated 17 July 2009 be and is hereby registered as an order of the High Court of Zimbabwe in the following terms:-
1.1 Respondent shall pay to the applicant the sum of US$103 208.38 as arrear commission.
1.2 Respondent shall bear costs of this application.” More
This is an application for summary judgment in terms of Rule 64 of the High Court Rules of 1971 which provides as follows:
“64. Application for summary judgment
(1) Where the defendant has entered appearance to a summons, the plaintiff may, at any time before a pretrial conference is held, make a court application in terms of this rule for the court to enter summary judgment for what is claimed in the summons and costs. More
