Court Judgements




Browse Judgements by Year

AURIGA MINERAL EXPLORATION PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS KORZIM STRATEGIC MINERALS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY AND SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE N.O (2023-11-29)
The applicant, Auriga Mineral Exploration (Pvt) Ltd, a holder of an Exclusive Prospecting Order Number 1806 (EPO 1806) which it says was issued in 2021 for a three-year period has brought this urgent application for an interdict. The basis is that the first respondent Korzim Strategic Minerals (Pvt) Ltd, has dangerously mined across a road by constructing a tunnel underneath it on the Shamva–Nyagande Road. The Applicant says it detected mining activities in its prospecting area on the 3rd of November 2023 through satellite images and went on an investigative mission to the site. It found dangerous workings on site... More

AURTHER NCUBE VERSUS NTANDOYENKOSI MLILO (2023-07-27)
This is an appeal against the whole of a judgment of the Magistrate Court (the court a quo) dated 29 August 2022, which granted a binding over order to keep the peace in favour of the respondent, and ordered the appellant to keep peace and stay away from Subdivision 3 of Darnaway Farm. More

AURTHUR BOSHA AND TAURAYI MANUWERE N.O. VERSUS THE STATE (2023-11-23)
The applicant is on trial before the first respondent, charged with criminal abuse of duty as a public officer as defined in s 174(1) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. The definition of the crime was recently amended. The amendments have no bearing on the issues raised by this review since the crime was allegedly committed before the amendments. More

AUSTIN GIFT MUSARA VERSUS THE STATE (2023-09-18)
This is an appeal against conviction and sentence. The appellant was convicted of rape as defined in s 65(1) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. He was sentenced to 8 years imprisonment of which 3 years were suspended for 5 years on the usual condition of good behaviour, to leave the effective custodial term of 5 years. More

AUSTIN RAJABU AND J.H. BUTLER FARMS LTD. (2023-09-08)
The material background facts to the matter are as follows; the applicant is a former employee of the respondent. He was employed as a general hand in the Tobacco Section. On the 17th *March 2022 the respondent levelled a charge of misconduct against the Applicant. The Applicant was subsequently suspended from employment ‘until further notice’ on the 24th of March, 2022. He was later charged with committing ‘any conduct inconsistent with the fulfilment of the express or implied terms of his employment contract’. On the 7th of April 2022 he appeared before a Disciplinary Authority to answer to the charge.... More

AUXILLIA MUNGWAIRA VERSUS THE STATE (2023-02-16)
The applicant applies for condonation of late noting of an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court and for leave to appeal under the following background. The applicant together with the co-accused at trial was convicted by the senior magistrate, at Harare on 26 March 1012 upon a charge of bribery as defined by s 170(1)(a) of the (Criminal Law Codification and Reform ) Act [Chapter 9:23]. The details of the charge in brief were on 24 January, 2012 the applicant with her accomplice or either of them, being prosecutors in the employ of the Attorney General Office... More

AVIM INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD VERSUS HWANGE COLLIERY COMPANY LTD AND ZHONG JIAN (PVT) LTD AND DALE SITUTU SIBANDA AND MUTSA MOLLIE JEAN REMBA AND SALOME RUTENDO CHICHAYA AND BLAKE MHATIWA AND BAO JUZHENG (2023-05-04)
This is an application for contempt of court wherein the applicant seeks an order in the following terms: More


Midlands State University Library