Court Judgements




Browse Judgements by Year

ELECTRICITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED VERSUS PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF ZIMBABWE AND VICE-PRESIDENT OF ZIMBABWE N.O AND MINISTER OF FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT N.O AND ZIMBABWE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION AND INHEMETER CO. LTD (2024-02-13)
The roots of the dispute in this matter lie in tender ZETDC/Inter/O7/21 for the supply and delivery of prepayment meters vending system flighted by the fourth respondent. The applicant submitted a bid and was unsuccessful whilst the fifth respondent was the successful bidder. The applicant sought to challenge the bidding process and was advised that it should pay the sum of US$50 000 for that purpose. The applicant holds a strong view that the requirement to pay security to challenge a bidding process is unconstitutional. It is trite that the applicant is a company registered in England and Wales. It... More

ELLETA NENGOMASHA VERSUS NGONI ALEX ROBBINS (2024-03-21)
This is a court application for variation of a custody and access order. The applicant and respondent are ex-wife and ex-husband respectively; their divorce having been granted in 2019 by this Honorable Court. The applicant seeks variation for custody and access order previously granted. More

EX-CONSTABLE CHENGETA F 064520 E VERSUS THE BOARD PRESIDENT (CHIEF SUPERINTENT DUBE M) AND THE COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE (2024-01-18)
The applicant, an ex-constable in the Zimbabwe Republic Police appeared before a single officer on 18 December 2015 facing a charge of contravening paragraph 34 of the Schedule to the Police Act [Chapter 11:10] i.e., “Omitting or neglecting to perform any duty or performing any duty in an improper manner.” He was convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment. The applicant appealed the conviction and sentence to the Commissioner General of Police, and the appeal was dismissed in its entirety. Subsequent to the dismissal of the appeal, a Board of Inquiry was convened to inquire into his suitability to... More

FADZAI USAYI (NEE MAGARA) V LEONARD USAYI (2024-02-06)
This is an appeal against part of the judgment of the High Court (the court a quo) handed down on 30 August 2023 granting to the appellant a decree of divorce and distributing the matrimonial assets of the parties to them. The part of the judgment being appealed against is the award of what has been, in essence, their matrimonial home, to the respondent, while according to the appellant a bed and breakfast business (B n B) consisting of a two roomed cottage that the parties constructed on a subdivision of the matrimonial home. More

FADZAI MAROVANYIKA VERSUS WENGAIKWENDAMBAIRA & ANOR (2024-01-29)
The parties to the dispute were engaged in an employer employee relationship. The relationship ended and the employee approached the Labour officer with a claim of failure by the employer to pay notice pay, leave days, compensation for off days and public holidays see page 18 of the record which is the complaint form. More

FALCON GOLD ZIMBABWE LIMITED V (1) TAXING OFFICER N.O, (2) RIO GOLD (2024-03-06)
On 24 August 2023, acting in terms of r 56 (2) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018, the applicant filed the present chamber application for the review of the first respondent (taxing officer)’s decision. On 1 August 2023, the first respondent declined to award to the applicant the United States dollar denominated disbursements, which it had paid to its own counsel, at the interbank rate prevailing on the date of taxation. Instead, the first respondent awarded the applicant these costs in RTGS dollars at the interbank rate prevailing on the date on which the applicant had voluntarily paid counsel in... More

FREDA REBECCA GOLD MINE LIMITED VERSUS EDMORE MAPONDERA AND 60 OTHERS (2024-01-30)
This is an appeal against the decision of the arbitrator who ruled that the respondent employees who had refused to sign new USD contracts had not repudiated their contracts and put themselves out of employment. The matter has a long and chequered history of being in the Labour Court and in the Supreme Court. The instant judgment is written out in fulfilment of a remittal order from the Supreme Court where after the Supreme Court concluded on the issue of citation it remitted the matter to this court so that the merits of the appeal could be entertained. More


Midlands State University Library